<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look folks, Jonny Gomes isn&#8217;t THAT bad in right field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/</link>
	<description>Tampa Bay Rays Blog and News - Rays of Light</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik H</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/comment-page-1/#comment-6664</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/#comment-6664</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s actually pretty good besides the low BA.&quot;  Ummm the .332 OPB sucks.  A lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s actually pretty good besides the low BA.&#8221;  Ummm the .332 OPB sucks.  A lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J.</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/comment-page-1/#comment-6657</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/#comment-6657</guid>
		<description>I have been saying that the Rays should go after Juan Rivera. I haven&#039;t done a great job of explaining myself first, though.  I do think the Rays should give Gomes a shot for the 1st month to see if he can handle the job full-time.  I don&#039;t personally think he will handle the job very well though.  I could be wrong, and wouldn&#039;t mind being wrong if it meant success for the Rays.  I think he is better off as a DH against lefties, and occasionally plays against righties.  I love his hustle and passion for the game, and always will.  You root for people like him because he plays with such a high intensity.  But he swings aimlessly at breaking balls in the dirt, and is not strong in the outfield.  I think there are better alternatives via the trade to handle the job full-time.  But as I said, the Rays should give Gomes the opportunity to have the job for the 1st month of the season.  If he doesn&#039;t look like he will hold up full-time, there will be options on the trade market to go after.  I will disagree with Jason about how many HR he will have though.  I think if he gets 500 AB&#039;s, he has a chance at 30, but doubt it.  I think if he were to get 500 AB, his numbers would be similar to this:  .258 BA, 26 HR, .332 OBP, 28 2B, 74 RBI, 12 SB.  Looking strictly at offense, that&#039;s not very bad at all.  It&#039;s actually pretty good besides the low BA.  But I still prefer to see a better defensive RF if at all possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been saying that the Rays should go after Juan Rivera. I haven&#8217;t done a great job of explaining myself first, though.  I do think the Rays should give Gomes a shot for the 1st month to see if he can handle the job full-time.  I don&#8217;t personally think he will handle the job very well though.  I could be wrong, and wouldn&#8217;t mind being wrong if it meant success for the Rays.  I think he is better off as a DH against lefties, and occasionally plays against righties.  I love his hustle and passion for the game, and always will.  You root for people like him because he plays with such a high intensity.  But he swings aimlessly at breaking balls in the dirt, and is not strong in the outfield.  I think there are better alternatives via the trade to handle the job full-time.  But as I said, the Rays should give Gomes the opportunity to have the job for the 1st month of the season.  If he doesn&#8217;t look like he will hold up full-time, there will be options on the trade market to go after.  I will disagree with Jason about how many HR he will have though.  I think if he gets 500 AB&#8217;s, he has a chance at 30, but doubt it.  I think if he were to get 500 AB, his numbers would be similar to this:  .258 BA, 26 HR, .332 OBP, 28 2B, 74 RBI, 12 SB.  Looking strictly at offense, that&#8217;s not very bad at all.  It&#8217;s actually pretty good besides the low BA.  But I still prefer to see a better defensive RF if at all possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillG</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/comment-page-1/#comment-6656</link>
		<dc:creator>BillG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/#comment-6656</guid>
		<description>Let the boy play in 0-8!  If it does not work out, look to the prospects or trade material for our pennant run of 0-9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the boy play in 0-8!  If it does not work out, look to the prospects or trade material for our pennant run of 0-9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazleton Jason</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/comment-page-1/#comment-6655</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazleton Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/#comment-6655</guid>
		<description>More playing time= more success for Jonny, ESPECIALLY if he is the one standing in RF.  
He has always proven that he hits better when he is part of the game and in the field.  I think this could be a breakout season for Jonny, last year he got such limited playing time, or playing time for short stretches, it is hard for him to get into a groove.
Can Jonny gomes hit .270??? probably not, but I bet with a little better plate disclipline, he could definately go in 500AB
.255 with a .340-.365OBP (he does take some pitches) 30-35 HR 80-90 RBI and aboout 30 doubles, and he can steal ya 10 bases.  
Yes a platoon might be necessary, but I think JG should be in RF 4 days out of 5...

I have wondered out loud about who else we could get for RF and the only few I have interest in are Ethier and Teahen...  I&#039;d like to see what Jonny can do as &quot;the man&quot; first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More playing time= more success for Jonny, ESPECIALLY if he is the one standing in RF.<br />
He has always proven that he hits better when he is part of the game and in the field.  I think this could be a breakout season for Jonny, last year he got such limited playing time, or playing time for short stretches, it is hard for him to get into a groove.<br />
Can Jonny gomes hit .270??? probably not, but I bet with a little better plate disclipline, he could definately go in 500AB<br />
.255 with a .340-.365OBP (he does take some pitches) 30-35 HR 80-90 RBI and aboout 30 doubles, and he can steal ya 10 bases.<br />
Yes a platoon might be necessary, but I think JG should be in RF 4 days out of 5&#8230;</p>
<p>I have wondered out loud about who else we could get for RF and the only few I have interest in are Ethier and Teahen&#8230;  I&#8217;d like to see what Jonny can do as &#8220;the man&#8221; first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik H</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/comment-page-1/#comment-6654</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/#comment-6654</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll admit I was wrong about his defense.  I know he&#039;s not the worst right fielder in the world.  I should have used another word instead of &quot;disaster&quot;.  He doesn&#039;t have that many games in RF, 76 by my count, so that&#039;s a small sample size.  As our team is currently constructed I would rather have him out there than the other cast of characters the Rays have.  I was merely trying to exaggerate my point of wanting Ruggiano to get more playing time.  I&#039;ve met Jonny, I like Jonny, I just wish he could hit right handers better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll admit I was wrong about his defense.  I know he&#8217;s not the worst right fielder in the world.  I should have used another word instead of &#8220;disaster&#8221;.  He doesn&#8217;t have that many games in RF, 76 by my count, so that&#8217;s a small sample size.  As our team is currently constructed I would rather have him out there than the other cast of characters the Rays have.  I was merely trying to exaggerate my point of wanting Ruggiano to get more playing time.  I&#8217;ve met Jonny, I like Jonny, I just wish he could hit right handers better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobr</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/comment-page-1/#comment-6653</link>
		<dc:creator>bobr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/#comment-6653</guid>
		<description>I meant relieve him against particularly tough righties, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant relieve him against particularly tough righties, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobr</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/comment-page-1/#comment-6652</link>
		<dc:creator>bobr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/raysoflight/2008/03/14/look-folks-jonny-gomes-isnt-that-bad-in-right-field/#comment-6652</guid>
		<description>I think you are absolutely right Scott. In fact, I also think you have pinpointed the real concern, which is that he flails helplessly at right handed pitchers and so the Rays need a lefty platoon partner, or at least someone to relieve him against particularly tough lefties. I say that, because Gomes would likely get only about 1/3 of the ABs in a strict platoon, and I think he would have problems with such infrequent use.

But it is there that the defensive issues arise. I think Rodriguez or Hinske can hit well enough, especially in a platoon, but doubt either can play RF well enough. And I also do not think the Rays want to expose Floyd in the field too much, both because he is not a good defensive player and because of the injury problem. So unless the Rays can find a right fielder who they expect to play there regularly (with Gomes/Floyd as the DH platoon and Gomes getting some more ABs relieving Crawford and in other roles to stay sharp), they need at least an adequate defensive lefty platoon partner there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are absolutely right Scott. In fact, I also think you have pinpointed the real concern, which is that he flails helplessly at right handed pitchers and so the Rays need a lefty platoon partner, or at least someone to relieve him against particularly tough lefties. I say that, because Gomes would likely get only about 1/3 of the ABs in a strict platoon, and I think he would have problems with such infrequent use.</p>
<p>But it is there that the defensive issues arise. I think Rodriguez or Hinske can hit well enough, especially in a platoon, but doubt either can play RF well enough. And I also do not think the Rays want to expose Floyd in the field too much, both because he is not a good defensive player and because of the injury problem. So unless the Rays can find a right fielder who they expect to play there regularly (with Gomes/Floyd as the DH platoon and Gomes getting some more ABs relieving Crawford and in other roles to stay sharp), they need at least an adequate defensive lefty platoon partner there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
