Rays of Light

Archive for October, 2007

The Coffee - Happy Halloween

Wednesday, October 31st, 2007

Not a whole lot of news today. Reid Brignac still can’t hit in the AFL, Curt Schilling doesn’t want to be a Ray after all, and Josh Paul is a free agent.

In the spirit of Halloween today, I figured we’d ask the following question:

What would scare you the most about the 2008 Devil Rays?

For me, it would be the possibility of going into the season with the exact same bullpen that we have right now. I’m not saying that I expect the DRO to sit on its hands and do nothing, but its still a thought in the back of my head. The last thing I want is another season of Shawn Camp and Brian Stokes trying to get outs. I have faith that Joe will give most of those innings to some of the better arms, but you just never know. I’m starting to agree with everyone else that I want to sign an Eric Gagne or Kerry Wood if they’d have us.

The Coffee - Talkin’ Roster Moves

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

Apologies for my lack of updates lately, but I’ve been terribly busy…

In what will probably amount to a largely inconsequential move, the Rays picked up Kurt Birkins off of waivers from Baltimore today and designated Raul Casanova for assignment. (Source)

This does not mean that the Birkins will factor into the rotation next year or even that he will remain on the roster until Opening Day. It simply means that someone within the organization saw something in Birkins that led him believe that he was worth a look.

Here are some facts about Birkins:

  • Never more than a middle-of-the-road pitcher. Stats of 9.04 H/9, 0.69 HR/9, 2.83 BB/9, 7.33 K/9, and 1.32 WHIP in 664 minor league innings. He’s been bad in the big leagues. (Baseball Cube)
  • MLB numbers are better against lefties than righties, but still not all that good. (Baseball Reference)

    He’s not an improvement over anyone currently on the roster, so don’t expect to see him come April.


  • I’ll have the latest Q&A&A for your later this week, but if you can’t wait to see some of the gems that Bill Chastain has for me to work with, check out his latest mailbag. (Devilrays.com)
  • The latest news on Jim Hickey? Well, there is no news. (Marc Lancaster)
  • I really like Stacy Long and think his coverage of Montgomery is great, but he should leave the comedy to the professionals. “Birkins’ stock goes to the Rays”? Come on, Stacy… (Stacy Long)

  • It’s the off-season - Now What?

    Monday, October 29th, 2007

    With the Red Sox taking down the Rockies, it’s time to look toward 2008. I can’t tell you how much my wife gets annoyed with the idea that baseball never seems to sleep. The regular season is fun, but the off-season can be just as fun and suspenseful now that free agency has boomed over the past 15 to 20 years. I’d like to put a spotlight on some key dates to watch as we inch closer to the new season.

    November 12th, 2007 - Last day for eligible players to file for free agency. Until this day, the former club has exclusive rights to negotiate a new deal with the player. This came into play with Aramis Ramirez when the Cubs went right to the wire trying to re-sign him. Ramirez went to the open market but quickly re-signed with the Cubs, despite being able to listen to other offers. Here are some potential players who are eligible to file for free agency from the Rays:

  • Greg Norton - ($1 million club option)
  • Al Reyes - ($1 million club option)

    November 13th, 2007 - First day Major League free agents may negotiate and sign with a club other than their former club

    November 5th - 8th, 2007 - General Managers meetings in Orlando, FL

    December 1st, 2007 - Last day for a team to offer arbitration to their players who have filed for free agency. Some teams elect not to do this for fear that the player will accept the offer and win in arbitration. A team must offer arbitration if they want to receive draft pick compensation for their lost player in the June draft. Failure to offer arbitration means you take the safe route, but get nothing if the player leaves to another team.

    December 3rd - 6th, 2007 - Winter Meetings in Nashville, TN
    These used to be a lot more exciting in terms of franchise type deals and big signings, but now they simply seem to be a lot more smoke and less fire. Maybe this year will be different with A-Rod dangling out there for teams and an upset Johan Santana after the Twins laid an egg around the trade deadline.

    December 6th, 2007 - Rule 5 Draft

    Here is a real good description of the Rule 5 from Wikipedia:

    As in the amateur draft, the selection order of the teams is based on each team’s win-loss record from the prior regular season, each round starting with the team with the worst record and proceeding in order to the team with the best record. Any player selected under Rule 5 is immediately added to his new team’s 40-man roster; thus, teams who do not have an available roster spot may not participate in the Rule 5 draft. Players who are not currently on their team’s 40-man roster are eligible to be selected in the Rule 5 draft, but only after a standard exemption period has elapsed. See Exemptions to Selection Eligibility below.

    If chosen in the Rule 5 draft, a player must be kept on the selecting team’s 25-man major league roster for the entire season after the draft–he may not be optioned or designated to the minors. The selecting team may, at any time, waive the Rule 5 draftee. If a Rule 5 draftee clears waivers by not signing with a new MLB team, he must be offered back to the original team, effectively canceling the Rule 5 draft choice. Once a Rule 5 draftee spends an entire season on his new team’s 25-man roster, his status reverts to normal and he may be optioned or designated for assignment.

    To prevent the abuse of the Rule 5 draft, the rule also states that the draftee must be active for at least 90 days. This keeps teams from drafting players, then placing them on the disabled list for the majority of the season. For example, if a Rule 5 draftee was only active for 67 days in his first season with his new club, he must be active for an additional 23 games in his second season to satisfy the Rule 5 requirements.

    Any player chosen in the Rule 5 draft may be traded to any team while under the Rule 5 restrictions, but the restrictions transfer to the new team. If the new team does not want to keep the player on its 25-man roster for the season, he must be offered back to the team of which he was a member when chosen in the draft.

    December 7th, 2007 - Last day for players who have been offered salary arbitration to accept or decline the offer. The team may continue to try to work out a deal with the player in the event that he declines the arbitration offer.

    February 1st - 21st, 2008 - Salary arbitration hearings are held and players are either rewarded with their desire or are forced to settle for what the team requested. It’s one or the other.

    February 14th, 2008 - Voluntary reporting date for pitchers & catchers.

    February 26th, 2008 - Mandatory reporting day for all other players

    March 30th, 2008 - Opening Day. All rosters reduced to 25 players before today.

    Hopefully that helps and will serve as a nice reference point as you follow throughout this off-season.

  • The Coffee - What Snells?

    Friday, October 26th, 2007

    There was actually some transaction news yesterday! The Rays claimed 26-year-old outfielder Chris Snelling off of waivers from the Oakland A’s and released Jay Witasick. (devilrays.com)

    Snelling was a pretty big prospect in the Mariners’ system a few years ago, but injuries have severely curtailed his career. When healthy he has a great eye, decent pop, and he won’t kill you with his glove. He could be a fine fourth outfielder, and makes Jonny Gomes and/or Elijah Dukes and/or Justin Ruggiano even more expendable. The designated hitter role wouldn’t be out of the question, nor would - in my opinion - giving him a first baseman’s mitt and letting him tool around over there in case something disastrous happens with Carlos Pena. He’s also highly-controllable, as he’s arbitration-eligble through 2009 according to Rotoworld. He likely won’t earn a heck of a lot through there. Rotoworld also had this to say about the move:

    It looks like Oakland hoped to have him clear waivers and then stick around as a minor league free agent. The Rays, though, opted to take a chance on the oft-injured 26-year-old. Snelling may never be able to contribute as an outfielder because of his inability to stay healthy, and he doesn’t have the power one wants to see from a designated hitter. There’s still a chance that he’ll put it all together and turn in a quality season as a regular at some point, but he certainly can’t be counted on.

    Here’s Sportsnet.ca’s scouting report on him:

    Assets
    A strong pure hitter who lines the ball hard into the gaps with occasional power. Has great baseball instincts.

    Flaws
    Has been very injury-prone, and that’s an understatement. Leg injuries have robbed him of any speed he once had.

    Career potential
    Can be a steady .300 hitter.

    Here’s an interesting note about him: he gets hit by a TON of pitches. Check out his stats from The Baseball Cube to see what I mean.

    Roster Move Alert

    Friday, October 26th, 2007

    I’m sure Scott will expand on this today, but I wanted to throw this out there in the meantime.

    The Rays claimed OF Chris Snelling off waivers from Oakland; Released RHP Jay Witasick.

    Mariners’ fans (Snelling’s original team) discuss the move.

    The Coffee - Rays End of Season Awards

    Thursday, October 25th, 2007

    I’ve been sitting on this one a while, looking for a good reason to run it. My reason today? I couldn’t think of anything better to write. How’s that for brutal honesty?

    Anyways, the Rays of Light staff held an internal poll to determine the Rays End-of-Season Awards, and I wanted to share those with you guys. Feel free to agree, disagree, discuss, and argue all of these picks. That’s why I post them, after all.

    Rays MVP - Carlos Pena
    Come on, now? Was there really a debate here? I suppose you could’ve made the argument that Greg Norton was the MVP for getting hurt and allowing Carlos the opportunity to play, but there was really no other choice than the man of a million nicknames.

    He hit .282/.411/.627 this year for an OPS+ of 172. His VORP was a ridiculous 68.5 and he had a WARP1 of 10.0 on a team that only won 66 games. Holy crap was he good. The problem is, people are probably going to expect this out of him every year from now on, but I just don’t see how he can do it again.

    He added a fluidity to the middle of the lineup that forced pitchers to work hard, and he solidified a position that many teams across baseball have struggled to figure out. He should get some votes for AL MVP behind A-Rod, and would likely get a few more if he played somewhere else.

    Rays Gold Glove - Akinori Iwamura
    Despite what Bill Chastain wants you to believe, Akinori Iwamura was superior to everyone else on the infield. Yeah, he looked better playing next to the “Human Error Machine” Josh Wilson and Brendan “Stiff as a Board” Harris, but he made some truly brilliant plays down at the hot corner this year.

    There weren’t really very many candidates for this award, so Iwamura pretty much won in a landslide. Carl Crawford played his typically-good but sometimes-lazy left field, while Bossman Junior and Delmonster looked both brilliant at times and lost at others. Dioner Navarro made a few too many dumb errors. Pena played an excellent first base, and saved plenty of errors with his soft hands, but in the end, Aki’s our guy.

    Rays Cy Young - Scott Kazmir
    All “Kid K” did this year was improve in pretty much every area while leading the American League in strikeouts. He was particularly great after the All-Star Break when he threw 94.1 innings, allowing only 77 hits and striking out 124. He pitched to a 2.39 ERA in that time, allowing only 6 home runs. He was much better than his 8-3 record would have you believe. To think that he is only 23 is so terribly exciting, but it’s also kind of worrisome. There have been plenty of pitchers that have “thrown themselves out” at a young age, and you have to just hope that he isn’t one of them.

    James Shields made a nice effort to earn this spot, but in the end, there was no one else that we could give this one to.

    Rays Rookie of the Year - Delmon Young
    Yeah, this one was kind of stupid, since there were only about 3 people who you could even consider, and Andy Sonnanstine and Jason Hammel certainly didn’t do nearly enough to even think about wrestling the title away from Delmon.

    I know I give Delmon a hard time here, but he really didn’t have an awful season. If you consider that he just turned 22 last month and only has 4 years of pro ball under his belt, you’re willing to bet that he’ll improve upon his .288/.316/.408 as the years go by. Not only that, but he’s got an absolute CANNON of an arm in right field. Though its very difficult to assess the tangible effect that has, it’s certainly impressive. Will he ever be the guy who goes for an .880 OPS like he did in the minors, or hit for a .538 SLG like he did in 2004? Probably not, but is a .300/.340/.460 completely out of the realm of possibility? Absolutely not.

    Rays Minor League Player of the Year - Evan Longoria
    I’ve never been shy about my Evan Longoria man-love, and he certainly is the trendy pick for this award. The merits of including him on the Opening Day roster next year have been much-discussed in recent weeks on the site, but the best thing to know is that he just turned 22 years old and just played his first full season of pro ball, hitting .299/.402/.520 this season in AA/AAA, and he plays the hell out of third base. His plate patience is the one thing that you really have to be impressed with, as he walked 73 times in 558 plate appearances this year. Will these numbers translate to the big leagues? Who knows. Will he be up with the big squad sooner rather than later? You bet.

    Rays Unsung Hero - Greg Norton
    Greg Norton? Really? Why?

    See Ex. A above: Carlos Pena, and you’ll see all you need to know.

    Q&A&A #2

    Wednesday, October 24th, 2007

    The latest from Bill Chastain, and my ridiculous attempt to rip him off. (Bill Chastain)

    Doesn’t it sound a little desperate to suggest Evan Longoria could start at third base coming out of Spring Training next year? He’s only had one month at the Triple-A level, where he hit .275. Shouldn’t he spend at least the first half of next year at Durham and maybe come up after the All Star break?
    –Larry A., Seminole, Fla.

    I agree with you on the surface, but the Rays’ explanation seemed reasonable. The powers that be will huddle and discuss whether they believe he is ready for spring. Player development honchos will be included in this meeting, which is critical since these professional evaluators are the guys who have seen Longoria play, this year and throughout his career, and can fairly judge whether he’s ready.

    To his credit, manager Joe Maddon said at the end of the season he would not weigh in on the matter by interfering with the process, noting that he remembered being in player development and how frustrating it was to have the Major League club try to throw its weight around in such decisions. Maddon did say the jury was out on Longoria and the odds of him being the starting third baseman are 50-50. The Rays have said they will make this decision prior to Spring Training, so the 30 or so games in March won’t serve as a tryout. If Longoria is ready and pans out, the Rays will have power at both corners, something they have not had at any point in the franchise’s brief history.

    Doesn’t it sound desperate to suggest that the Rays should expect Brendan Harris and Akinori Iwamura will be able to match or exceed their 2007 seasons? Both were serviceable (Harris - 25.2 VORP, Iwamura - 15.3 VORP), but neither was the kind of guy you build a lineup around. It’s not like we were on the verge of the playoffs in 2007. What would it really hurt to have Evan Longoria on the Major League roster come opening day?

    And don’t even get me started on your ridiculous use of batting average to deem Longoria’s time in AAA a success or failure. Why not point to his .398 OBP or his .888 OPS as successes? Oh, right. That wouldn’t make your outdated point.

    Why does it appear to everyone who follows the Rays organization that Brendan Harris is going to be odd man out this next spring? Despite his doing anything and everything that was asked of him this season, he seems destined, even in a best-case scenario, for the utility spot. He clearly outplayed both Josh Wilson and Akinori Iwamura throughout the season, with both his glove and his bat; Wilson was out-classed by Jorge Velandia during his short appearance. Why is Harris getting the short end, despite all of his accomplishments? Iwamura clearly wore down as well through the course of the season, as his average indicates, and Wilson never really posed any kind of threat to anybody’s pitching staff. Why? I honestly don’t expect a published answer, let alone a personal reply. You tend to just answer the obvious, easily answered, non-controversial questions posed. Maybe you should run for public office. I looking forward to any kind of response that you can come up with.
    –Ron H., Port St. Lucie, Fla.

    Don’t think I’ll run for public office, but here’s what I see: I agree with you. Harris had a great season, and I believe he should start — at second base.

    Several scenarios could impact what happens to him in 2008. First, if Longoria becomes the team’s third baseman, the Rays would have Iwamura dangling without a position, leaving him, Wilson, Harris and, perhaps, Ben Zobrist competing for shortstop and second base. I think the Rays did Harris a favor at the end of last summer by watching him play second base, as I believe it’s a position he can settle into. Meanwhile, shortstop is a different animal. In my opinion, a team needs an artist at shortstop, a guy with great range and soft hands who can field ground balls standing on his head. Having such a shortstop is even more important on a team with a young pitching staff, like the Rays.

    While some of the aforementioned played adequate shortstop last season, I don’t believe any of them are true shortstops. So I can see the Rays trying to trade or sign a quality shortstop during the offseason. If the team has a new shortstop, with Harris as the everyday second baseman and Longoria at third, I believe Iwamura could become a Ty Wigginton type by spending time at multiple positions. If the team acquires a new shortstop and Longoria doesn’t make the team, Iwamura would play third and Harris would be at second.

    One final scenario, which would make for a stepped-up offense, would see Longoria at third, Iwamura at second and Harris at shortstop. Wilson, Velandia, and Zobrist should contend for a utility spot.

    Did you REALLY say that Brendan Harris outperformed Akinori Iwamura defensively? Are you SERIOUS? Dude, seriously?? I need to take a second here.

    Harris had quite a good season, for sure, but his career OPS of .749 in the big leagues and his very high K rate indicate a player who will likely never be more than a role player. That’s not to say that Akinori Iwamura IS that kind of player, but his OBP was 30 points higher than Harris’ in 2007. To be honest, I’d be interested to see how either of the two players fit into the Rays’ plans beyond 2008.

    I’m totally with Chastain that Iwamura, Harris, Wilson, Zobrist, and Velandia will all be competing for the infield spots next season. I disagree, though, that Harris has the leg up on the shortstop spot. This is not meant as a knock to Chastain, I just really think that Zobrist’s defense and OBP capabilities make him more of a viable everyday option in the long-term. BenZo has a lot to prove for sure, but I still like him.

    By the way, I love “I don’t really expect you to answer my question” guy. He’s totally awesome.

    Everyone knows what the problem was for the Rays last year. It was pitching, obviously. If we can make some trades out of the bullpen and even in our Minor League system, we could pick up a couple of veteran guys in the pitching staff. Who would you want to trade?
    –Josh, Lakeland, Fla.

    The hard part about trades is you have to give up something to get something in return. In my opinion, shortstop, catcher, and middle relief are the team’s problem areas. Who does the team give up to address these areas? Well, that depends on how strong a player — or players — the Rays want to get in return. In this light, the most marketable player on the team, other than Scott Kazmir and James Shields, is Carl Crawford. Personally, he is one of my favorite players on the team. He works hard, he’s a legitimate superstar and he’s flat-out fun to watch. However, if the Rays were to trade him, they could probably get a quality shortstop or catcher, along with a solid middle reliever in return. And while they would miss Crawford a great deal, finding a veteran left fielder, even though his numbers and performance would likely pale in comparison to Crawford’s, is a lot easier than finding a shortstop, catcher or pitching. Pulling the trigger on such a deal would take some courage, though, given the fact Crawford is a fan favorite and he will likely thrive wherever he plays.

    Way to fuel the “Let’s trade Carl Crawford” flame, Bill. You would have to blow me away for Carl Crawford. I’m talking Joe Mauer or Jarrod Saltalamacchia and a lot of other extras in order to make me talk, and even then I might not say yes.

    I also think that shortstop and relief pitching are MUCH more dire needs than catcher. Did you decide to stop watching the second half of 2007? Dioner Navarro really came to play after the All-Star Break, so I think making sure he has a solid backup is a priority, but I wouldn’t quite call the entire position a need.

    Why wasn’t closer listed? Do you REALLY think Al Reyes is a good option there? He was decent last year, but he’s certainly not a true stopper.

    I personally liked how well the rotation did over the last month or so of the season. With that being said, do you see Jeff Niemann coming in and earning the closer role next year? From all the reports I’ve seen, he’s got a big fastball and good slider. His 6-foot-8, 280-lb. presence on the mound would make for a tough matchup for any team trailing in the ninth. On top of that, he can’t seem to handle a lot of innings, so putting him in the pen could save his arm. Who knows, he could turn out like Jonathan Papelbon did.
    –Dre’ S., Tampa

    I have not heard any talk from the Rays about making such a move, but it makes sense to me. After Kazmir and Shields at the head of the rotation, I think David Price will join the group next summer, leaving the Rays to find two more starters from a group of players including Edwin Jackson, Andy Sonnanstine, Jason Hammel, Niemann and Mitch Talbot. It only makes sense that some of these live young arms find their way to the bullpen.

    You liked the 5.06 ERA posted by the staff in September? Wow, your standards are low, dude. Personally, I was a lot more fond of the 4.49 ERA in August. But what do I know?

    It’s interesting, though, that you would mention Jeff Niemann as an option at the closer position. That has been mentioned here in the past, and I certainly would endorse the move because he seems to have the make-up of someone who would succeed in the role. With the wealth of minor league starting pitching that the Rays have, it would also make such a move easier. Bill is certainly right that there are a number of arms who could find their way into the bullpen.

    Good questions today, fellas. And Chastain was only marginally dumb.


  • Draysbay is reporting that Jae Seo and Tim Corcoran have been granted free agency. I don’t know what the source is, because I can’t find it corroborated anywhere else, but I’ll take their word on it. (Draysbay)

  • The Coffee - Beating the Dead Horse

    Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

    Just to continue the Alex Rodriguez pipe-dream, I posted the following last night in the comments to yesterday’s Coffee Thread.

    Assuming that Alex Rodriguez takes all of the at bats that had been given to Brendan Harris and Josh Wilson this year, A-Rod would’ve been worth 8 wins all by himself. (11 WARP1 versus 2.6 (Harris) and .4 (Wilson))

    You can realistically assume that Evan Longoria could provide a WARP1 of 4 in his first full season. That right there is an improvement of 12 games.

    Dioner Navarro and Delmon Young could both be expected to improve (let’s say one win each), while we could have Rocco Baldelli (6.2 in 2004) for a full season in place of the Jonny Gomes-Greg Norton duo (2.4 in 2007). That’s 4 more wins.

    I realize that there are fundamental flaws in this argument, but I think you see my point: these things could conceivably equal an 18-win turn in 2007. That’s 84-78 for those of you paying attention. Add in a little bit more pitching, and you’ve got a bonafide Wild Card contender.

    Let me make a few points:

  • I realize that there is virtually no chance of Alex Rodriguez signing with the Rays.
  • I realize that the logic used in the above argument is flawed, and should only be viewed as a very basic attempt to assess an Alex Rodriguez-led Tampa Bay team’s chances of winning games in 2008.
  • I realize that I am absolutely beating a dead horse here.

    Look for Version 2 of the Q&A&A about Bill Chastain’s latest on Wednesday.

  • The Coffee - Weekend Link Roundup

    Monday, October 22nd, 2007

  • And the Red Sox win the pennant. (Dropkick Murphys)

    I hope Red Sox Nation gets swept out of the Series by Colorado, but I’ve got a bad feeling that we’re going to have a winter of annoying Red Sox fans telling us how great the Sawx are. And it sucks that they have such a wicked cool song like “Tessie.”

  • David Price is similar to.. Mark Prior? (Russell Sandman and Evan Rosen)

    We canít resist drawing a comparison to Mark Prior (not just because both were college phenoms with five-letter last names beginning with the letter P). Prior was drafted by Chicago with the second overall pick in the first round of the 2001 amateur draft. At 6í5 and at age 20, Prior had averaged just under 1.4 K/IP and 0.83 hits per inning-pitched. Compared to Prior, David Price posted a 1.4 K/IP or greater and 0.7 H/IP. Mark Prior was only Priceís superior in allowing a stingy 61 walks in 267 innings-pitched during his two year stint at USC. Both pitchers were standouts at every level and displayed supernatural dominance and command early in their development.

    I sure hope not.

  • The Pirates are still shopping Jason Bay. I’d still listen. (MLB Trade Rumors)

    I know that Jack Wilson is the de facto Move We Should Make(TM) for the 2008 off-season according to many people, but I’ve always been a big Jason Bay fan. I know he’s been hurt (two bad knees), and I know his 2007 numbers were crap, but at his best, he’s certainly better offensively than Delmon Young. I say start at Bay-for-Young, and see where it goes from there. I’m crazy like that. The problem? Bay goes for nearly $6 million in 2008 and $7.5 million in 2009. Icky.

  • Don’t you just love the “(Insert Team Here) should get Carl Crawford” stories when there isn’t an offer attached to them? (Scot Gregor)
  • The Marlins the best fit for A-Rod? If them, why not us? (Chris Isidore)

    I said this a few weeks ago, but it got buried deep within the comments of a different post. Obviously, at the surface an Alex Rodriguez signing seems ridiculous, what with the $30 million asking price and all. But if you think about it, A-Rod is worth a TON of money in terms of ticket sales, merchandise, et al. He INSTANTLY gives more credibility to the franchise, and could conceivably DOUBLE the 2008 attendance. I’m not saying it will happen, but if A-Rod opts out, the Rays should take a good, long look at doubling the payroll to include the greatest player ever.

  • Insert various Baseball Prospectus notes here. (Bryan Smith)

    Amos (New York): Early favorites for who you would draft if you were the Rays next year? I know you’re not supposed to draft for need, but if they were to extend Carlos Pena, wouldn’t their corners be blocked for a quick comer like Pedro Alvarez? Or do you just make room for a guy like him?

    Bryan Smith: Barring a really fantastic spring from one of the high school stars, you draft Pedro, and you worry about it later. His bat is that special. However, I’m not sure extending Pena is the way to go. He’s going to be 30 next season, and given the Devil Rays goals are more geared towards 2010, projecting Pedro as the future 1b wouldn’t be the worst decision in the world.

    patsen29 (Toronto): What do you expect a Rays lineup to look like in ‘09?

    Bryan Smith: Moving around the diamond: Navarro, Pena, Harris, Brignac, Longoria, Crawford, Upton, Young and Alvarez.

    RP (Chicago): Which side of the Jeff Niemann fence are you on?

    Bryan Smith: I’m pro Jeff Niemann as a guy that, literally, could be the fifth starter in Tampa soon. He’ll be inconsistent, but he’ll be brilliant sometimes.

    The Rays couldn’t go wrong with Pedro Alvarez, that’s for sure, but I really like Harold Martinez if only because of the similarities to Alex Rodriguez. I’m pretty sure my man-crush on A-Rod is pretty easy to notice at this point.

    Interesting that he doesn’t see Aki in the plans for 2009. That wouldn’t shock me, either. He’s probably more of a utility infielder.

    I suspect that Niemann will make a strong push for that 5th starter spot, but I also think that Jason Hammell and J.P. Howell are the early favorites because they’ve already been up. We’ll see.

  • The Coffee - The Hard Sell

    Friday, October 19th, 2007

    How do you convince a fan-base that is desperate for a winner that the current course of action - i.e. not splurging on a weak free agent market, or selling away the future in a blockbuster deal - is the way to go, and the current run of fiscal solvency is best for the organization in the long run?

    Certainly the results on the field haven’t born that out the past two years, as the Rays will be making the first overall pick in the draft next season. To the educated fan, there is certainly reason for optimism with the emergence of B.J. Upton, Scott Kazmir, and James Shields as bonafide stars in the league to complement the “veteran” Carl Crawford and Carlos Pena. There is certainly reason to believe that the Rays might’ve gotten a huge steal when the team traded Toby Hall and Mark Hendrickson to the Dodgers and brought back a catcher who could be in Rays blue (goodness that still sounds weird to say) for the next 15 years.

    Still, in a free agent market that will be set by the crown-jewels of Jorge Posada, Mariano Rivera, and Andy Pettite, how do you convince an already luke-warm fan base that we must stay the course and not spend $15MM or more per year to bring in one of those bodies. it’s tough to get people to come out and watch the growing pains of a young organization on a nightly basis, and in an area full of transplanted Red Sox and Yankees fans who expect a team to be able to simply purchase or trade for any player it wants, its very difficult to endure such a rebuilding process.

    It makes even the simplest things - like a trade of Jack Wilson that would, to many people, make sense - a very daunting task. $6.5MM is a lot of money to this franchise, and though Stu Sternberg said that he would up the payroll a bit this year (and perhaps even more for the right player), I certainly don’t think Jack Wilson was the player that Stu had in mind. Consider for a minute that - even though Jack is unhappy - the new management in Pittsburgh has no real motivation to move him except in a very lucrative deal. They can hold teams for ransom, and I would implore Andrew Friedman and the DRO to hold firm and not give in to any crazy demands that the Pirates would make for a player of WIlson’s caliber. Considering that you can get equal offensive production out of Brendan Harris, over $6MM is simply too much for a defensive upgrade.

    That last paragraph was, of course, in response to the discussion of last night about why (or why not) the Rays should go after Jack Wilson of the Pirates. I’ve made no secret of saying that I don’t want him and I don’t need him on my team, because I think any price we would have to pay for him would be a price too steep, since he would absolutely be here for only one season before bolting to whatever team offers him the most money. Reid Brignac is going to be the shortstop of the future, so unless you can pull off a Jack Wilson trade by giving up prospects I’ve never heard of and getting the poverty-crying Pirates to chip in some dough, I’m going to have to say no thanks.

    It’s very easy to sit here at the computer and talk about all of the thing we’d love to see the Rays do in the offseason, but really, anyone that expects this roster to look much different from the one that took the field at the Rogers Centre on that final Sunday of the year is probably in for a rude awakening come Spring Training. Moreover, the people that the Rays brass are trying to win over are going to be disenchanted when they see the same faces and the same numbers trotting out there next year.

    I’m no corporate shill, and I don’t work for the Rays, so this isn’t a company line, but I assure you: even if the Rays go into next season with the EXACT same roster that they have right now, it will be an improved team. It will be a team than contends for .500 - maybe even a team that contends for the Wild Card. If you’re hoping for wholesale changes or a revamped bullpen or a Gold Glove-caliber shortstop, you just might end up disappointed. I will, of course, continue to hope that the organization makes moves that improves the talent on the field, but I’m already prepared to hear the same names announced when March 31 rolls around.

  • Kevin Costner. Tampa Bay Rays. Match made in heaven. Or something like that. (Marc Topkin)
  • Scott Kazmir is happy about his season, and he is excited about next year. These are the kinds of stories we get during the playoffs. It’ll pick up eventually, I promise. (Bill Chastain)