It’s Hot Stove season and everywhere you look baseball fans are over-analyzing their newly acquired piece and crying over their lost hero. They check and re-check MLB Trade Rumors and the myriad of other rumor mills pumping falsehoods and selling fantasies. They obsess over the amount of wins a player will be worth or when their newly acquired prospect will start paying dividends. Yes, from the All-Star game going forward it is skin trade at it’s best.
I can’t remember ever thinking about the trade deadline until about 12 years ago. The 80’s and the 90’s did not produce this drama, did it? Then again, present media has a way of buffing a concept to a perfect shine and presenting it as a “thing” we must follow. The only way to get up to the minute news back then was to listen to the radio. Now my iPhone alerts me to rumors, not trades mind you, but rumors before they even become a rumor. They are the fetus of a rumor. They are a writer hypothesizing potential candidates and it turns into a rumor from there.
Oh, and by the way, don’t be fooled by misinformation, which is actually a tactical play by a GM or organization, coupled with downright lying of course. We are kept at the edge of our seats as Negotiation Theater plays on in the back rooms. Sometimes, I wonder if GM’s see the tweets and the articles and have a grand old laugh at the chaos they have caused. I could just see a GM thumbing through his twitter feed now, “HaHaHa, Matt Garza for Mike Olt…wasn’t even a thought!”
Then I start to obsess….
I wonder if keeping Matt Garza in a Cubs uniform isn’t the right thing to do? You know, sign him to a three or four year deal.
Think about that rotation for a minute…Shark, Wood, Garza, Jackson and a PTBNL….hmmmm. It really isn’t that bad. I still think it lacks a true stopper, a true ace if you will.
If there is one thing any team needs it’s starting pitching. We don’t need to give it away. Then again, he would have to agree to a four year deal. Maybe he thinks he can get more? Maybe four years is even too many?
Just thinking out loud here. Now, I know, the prudent thing may be to trade him away for some young guns that could be core pieces for the future say 2-3 years from now. But what if he was the leader 2-3 years from now? I say this completely regretting the amount of time the Cubs hung on to Ryan Dempster, Carlos Zambrano and just about every other viable trade piece they possessed over the last 10 years that netted very little in the end. I want to smack myself for even thinking it, but I can’t help it….I can’t quit you Matt Garza!
You see what happened there, I just waffled back a forth and still don’t know how I feel about the whole issue. Keep him or trade him? Crazy or sane? My brain actually produced the above line of thought a few days ago while reading the latest “hypothesis” on the web.
Should be a fun two weeks. I wonder who will be left in a Cub uniform when the blood is wiped from the trading block?