Archive for August, 2012

I’m A Believer

Friday, August 31st, 2012

Earlier this week I wrote that I’d rather face a crippling, explosive stomach virus than watch the Cubs get blown out again. I was only partially kidding.

I usually watch as many Cubs games as I can throughout the season, and listen to the games I can’t see. But when the season begins to slip into futility–usually around this time of year, if not sooner–I start to lose interest. I’ll still have Pat and Keith playing in the background at work, or keep the game on TV while I eat or read or play a game on my phone. But as we get closer and closer to the end of another lost season, the Cubs get less and less of my full attention.

“Why pay attention at all?” you might ask. Why bother watching or listening when the outcome seems preordained and the frustration plentiful? Why not give that time and attention to something less likely to make me want to wander out into traffic?

Simple. Because of games like yesterday. If you haven’t read Buddy’s recap of the game yet, you should. And watch the highlights. Watch ’em a couple times if you like. Because the show the Cubs put on Thursday afternoon is one we’ve seen very little of this season, and it’s worth a little extra time and attention.

I first checked the score when I came back from lunch yesterday–at that point, the Cubs were in a 9-3 hole, and I assumed the Brewers had us beat. I checked back a few minutes later and saw we’d put up a few runs, so I turned on the WGN Radio broadcast to ride out what I still assumed to be a loss-in-the-making with Pat and Keith.

You can always tell how a game is going by the tone of Pat Hughes’ voice, and while the Cubs were showing more life than usual in the sixth inning, it didn’t sound like he had high hopes either. After a Brewers pitching change and three more runs for the Cubs the game was tied, Pat’s tone had changed, and my interest was piqued.

However, the Cubs’ relievers came in and did what they do best–give up some runs. An 11-9 deficit dulled my interest in the game and sent Pat and Keith into an extended game of Name That Player. A couple times I came close to turning the game off, but I stuck with it.

I had no real expectation that my patience–our patience–would be rewarded. Only hope. Specifically, that misguided hope that’s common to all Cubs fans. The thing buried deep within our collective psyche that says every losing streak has to come to an end, every slump will someday bust, and that no team can lose forever. In a word, it’s faith. Despite more than a century of evidence to the contrary, we believe in the Cubs.

Thursday afternoon, that faith was rewarded. By my count, yesterday’s dramatic finale was just our sixth walk-off win of the season, and only the second since the All Star Break. In spite of back-to-back walk-off wins in late April against the Cardinals, this Cubs team has been pretty short in the drama department. There’s not much to be surprised about–it’s a team loaded with weaknesses, and we’ve seemingly (hopefully) seen all the various ways they can conspire to give away a game.

But when it all comes together like it did yesterday, you temporarily forget that the season is already over, that the postseason celebrations will have to wait for a little longer, and that the Eamus Catuli sign across Sheffield will have to tack on another year of futility. You get wrapped up in the excitement and you reassert your belief in the hope that it won’t always be this bad.

In those brief moments you shed your decades of built-up cynicism, angst, and frustration and remind yourself it’s just a game. A splendid, glorious game.

Go Cubs!

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Giants Series Preview

Friday, August 31st, 2012

Probable Pitchers

Courtesy of

Friday at1:20pm CT – Madison Bumgarner vs. Chris Volstad

Usually dominant at home and not one to give free passes, Bumgarner walked four as he allowed four runs in 6 1/3 innings in the Giants’ 7-3 loss to the Braves in his last start. He is 1-1 with a 2.08 ERA in two career starts at the Friendly Confines. Volstad doesn’t have to worry about the streak any more. He ended a 24-start winless streak in his last game, picking up the win over the Rockies as he threw 6 2/3 scoreless innings. He has a 3.82 ERA in five starts in August.

Saturday at 12:05pm CT – Tim Lincecum vs. Justin Germano

Lincecum searched for his rhythm in his last outing, allowing three runs in five innings against the Braves. He allowed two runs in a 32-pitch first inning, and he has now allowed 25 first-inning runs in 27 starts this season. Germano will be glad to be finished with the Brewers. He lost to them in back-to-back starts, giving up 12 runs over 9 2/3 innings combined. He’s had trouble getting through the batting order the second and third time as teams are figuring him out.

Sunday at 1:20pm CT – Matt Cain vs. Travis Wood

After winning just once in eight starts between June 24 and Aug. 6, Cain has gone 3-0 with a 1.82 ERA in his last four outings. He threw 118 pitches in his last start, his most in any start since he logged 125 in his June 13 perfect game. Wood posted his 11th quality start on Tuesday, yet also suffered his eighth straight loss. He is 0-8 with a 6.66 ERA in his last nine starts but has given up three runs or less in five of his last six outings.

Our Take

Despite the dramatic win yesterday, I don’t have high expectations for the Cubs this weekend. If you open your encyclopedia to the entry do a Google search for “out-classed,” you’ll get these pitching matchups. Short of a stomach virus sweeping through the Giants’ clubhouse, I’m not sure how the Cubs can really compete this weekend.

It’s not that the Giants’ pitchers don’t make mistakes—they do. But is this a Cubs team you really trust to capitalize on those mistakes? We just made Milwaukee’s staff look like world-beaters–what happens when we face off against two perennial Cy Young candidates?

We could have another 12-run explosion in reserve, but it would be a surprise. Far more likely that these will be low-scoring events, with frustration and missed opportunities aplenty. I’ll still watch, but I don’t have high hopes at all.

Series Prediction: Maybe one win. Maybe.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Game 130: Slugfest

Friday, August 31st, 2012

Box Score / Highlights / Condensed Game

What Went Right

  • The Cubs anemic offense (currently 15th in runs scored) did some serious damage. David DeJesus reached base five times, Luis Valbuena collected three hits (not a typo), Starlin Castro and Anthony Rizzo picked up two hits each, and Brett Jackson added two doubles and two walks.
  • Believe it or not, Cub batters walked 11 times. I’m playing the lottery tomorrow!
  • K-Rod took the hill for the Brewers in the final frame (thank you). In case you missed it, he and his fellow mound mates racked up 205 pitches.
  • Anthony Rizzo came through with a double in the 9th to tie the game. Alfonso Soriano followed with the winning knock.
  • James Russell and Carlos Marmol didn’t allow an earned run.
  • No errors for the defense.

What Went Wrong

  • Four Cub pitchers basically threw batting practice today. The Brewers pounded out 17 hits, seven for extra bases. Ryan Braun, Rickie Weeks, Jonathan Lucroy and the great Cody Ransom were especially lethal.
  • Darwin Barney went 0-5, dropping his on-base percentage to .295.
  • I didn’t get to see the first six innings. Bummer.

Not Exactly Nostradamus

Every March I get together with a group of fellow baseball freaks to make our official predictions for the upcoming season. Now that September is upon us, I thought it might be fun (or maybe embarrassing) to look back at my spring training random thoughts, gut feelings, crystal ball interpretations, etc. Here’s how I saw it a few months ago…

NL Central: Milwaukee, Cincinnati, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Chicago, Houston

For some strange reason I believed in the Brewers pitching staff. As of this writing, Milwaukee is 13th in ERA. Good call!

NL East: Philadelphia, Atlanta, Washington, Miami, NY Mets

The Nationals were a trendy pick, but I wasn’t drinking the Kool-Aid. Wrong again. At least I got the Marlins implosion right.

NL West: SF, Arizona, LA, Colorado, SD

Who would have guessed that Tim Lincecum would post a 5+ ERA? Can the Giants hold off the new-look Dodgers?

NL Wild Cards: Atlanta & Cincinnati

Looks like Dusty’s Reds will make the playoffs one way or the other, which still isn’t fun to say/type. Here’s hoping they get knocked out early.

AL Central: Detroit, Cleveland, Kansas City, Chicago, Minnesota

I couldn’t have been more wrong here. Cleveland was my “out of nowhere” contending team for 2012, and I thought the White Sox would be completely awful. Kudos to Chris from Illinois, who picked the White Sox to win the AL Central way back in March. Detroit may still bring home the division crown, but Robin’s crew isn’t going away.

AL East: NY Yankees, Boston, Tampa Bay, Toronto, Baltimore

I doubt even Buck Schowalter’s wife picked the Orioles to be competitive in 2012. Meanwhile, the Yankees keep rolling along.

AL West: Texas, LA/Anaheim, Oakland, Seattle

If the Angels can straighten out their bullpen, I may actually get this division right!

Wild Cards: Boston & LA/Anaheim

I really thought the Red Sox had too much talent for even Bobby Valentine to screw up. That’s what I get for thinking. By the way, the Angels were my pre-season pick to win it all. That prediction doesn’t look great right now, but of course anything can happen in the playoffs. If they make it.

Who was your World Series champ before the season began? Who would you pick now?

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Northside Archives: Post-Break Losers

Thursday, August 30th, 2012

The Post All-Star Break period started so well, but then the calendar turned to August…

The Good News
The Astros are terrible. Like all-time, record-breaking, epic terrible. As a point of reference, they were once 22-24. Since that day they’ve compiled an 18-66 record. That’s a .214 winning percentage – the equivalent of a 35 win season. With a 40-90 record, they’ve gone 9-47 since June 26; and sitting 9 wins back, they’d need a huge turnaround to finish ahead of the Cubs.

The Bad News
Houston is moving to the AL in 2013. Ok, that’s only part of it. As I think most of us know by now, the Cubs are 6-20 in August with only two games to go. Increasingly the question becomes, will they lose 100? Very likely. Or will they grab the title of ‘worst Cubs team ever’ with 104 losses? Possible. In 1962 & 1966 the Cubs lost 103 games. The .364 winning percentage in those years is the worst in franchise history.

Right now, the Cubs’ .380 winning percentage has them sitting fourth all-time on the franchise list. Even though they are 16-28 since the All-Star Game, they had been 10-8 in late-July. Remarkably, in four other seasons they’ve performed worse after the All-Star Break (’56, ’74, ’80, ’99). In the worst of those years the Cubs were 26-51 (.338), and that was just in 1999! But if August is any indication as to how the Cubs will finish the season, expect a 57-105 record. Unbelievably, the Cubs franchise ‘low’ isn’t really that low…

Relatively Good News, Relatively
The Cubs current franchise low (59-103) is tied for the 131st worst record in MLB history. The MLB list is littered with seasons from long ago – Philadelphia, Oakland, Boston, Baltimore, and Atlanta in particular had several teams on this list from the early-mid 1900s (in several cases, those franchises were in other cities at that point). Even the arch-rival Cardinals make the list several times, their worst record being 43-94 in 1903 (and that team was the beneficiary of some luck, their Pythagorean win percentage had them as merely a 42 win team).

What If?
Just for fun, let’s assume the Cubs don’t win again. Besides the fact that we would have the most bitter, self-flagellating, angst filled recaps imaginable we’d also finish 49-113. That would be (depending on what the Astros do – or more accurately, don’t do) the 23rd worst record of all-time. Only 3 of those seasons come after 1945 (’52 Pirates, ’62 Mets, ’03 Tigers).

I still say we finish somewhere between 55 and 62 wins (I know, I’m really going out on a limb there). But increasingly it seems we’ll be on the low end of that, and title of ‘worst Cubs team ever’ will be taken and bestowed on this team – hopefully, for all time.

(This post was written before today’s game, which–shocker!–looks like it will be another loss the Cubs just won in dramatic fashion. -ed.)

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Starlin Castro: Dictating his Future

Thursday, August 30th, 2012

Mo Money, Less Problems
This week the Cubs have announced a 7-year $60 million extension that buys out the first 3 years of Castro’s free agency. He will receive a 6M signing bonus, there’s also a club option for 16M for an 8th year (1M buyout, part of the 60M) and an MVP incentive that could bump the final 2 years up an additional 2M. In total Castro could earn 79M over the next 8 season. Here’s the yearly breakdown:

2013 (age 23): 5M
2014 (age 24): 5M
2015 (age 25): 6M
2016 (age 26): 7M
2017 (age 27): 9M
2018 (age 28): 10M
2019 (age 29): 11M (2M MVP clause if he wins or finishes top 5 in voting twice)
2020 (age 30): 16M (1M buyout & the 2M MVP clause if he wins or finishes top 5 in voting twice)

Here’s the many reasons why I love this deal. First, the team put a big chunk of the money at the beginning of the deal. Keeping Castro at basically 10M annually during his first 3 seasons he would have been a free agent is a savvy move. This will open up more money for the rest of the team, during seasons the Cubs will be competitive.

Second, the team is buying low. Castro is having his worst season statistically of his young career. This was a perfect time to lock him down long-term if you believe he’s just going to keep getting better. If Castro has a breakout season in the next year or two, he would be owed a lot more than what he just got. Even if Castro doesn’t improve but maintains a similar level of production the team still saved money. For example, look at Hunter Pence, a solid 3-4WAR player who also was a Super Two. He will make 35M during his 4 arbitration seasons. Including the signing bonus, Castro will make only 29M over his first four years.

Finally, the team now has control of Castro’s prime seasons (26-30). They will also be in an excellent position to extend Castro again before he hits free agency to buy out the rest of his productive years (31-34). If the team approaches Castro and offer another 8 year extension when he has 3 seasons left on his current deal, the Cubs could have Castro’s entire productive career at a discount, without having to pay big money for his decline seasons (35+). If the Cubs do not want Castro past his prime, they can trade him before the end of the 2019 season as his 10/5 rights won’t kick in unless the team accepts his option for 2020. This is a very shrewd move by a front office who looks to have learned from long term mistakes of the past.

Getting Better Despite the Numbers
It’s easy to look at Castro’s dip in batting average, abysmal OBP and errors then argue that Castro hasn’t improved at all this year and the Cubs are taking on a huge risk with this long term deal; however, in the two areas that concerned the Cubs the most, Castro has made marked improvements. Castro’s defense is much improved to the point I believe, and even more importantly, the Cubs believe, Castro is a long-term SS. His footwork and throwing look much better than his first two seasons and the advanced metrics show him as an above average defender (3.2 UZR). While he still makes his share of errors usually due to his concentration issues, he makes more difficult defensive plays that outweigh these negatives.

He’s also made some huge strides with his plate approach since late June. On June 24th, Castro was hitting above .300, however he was walking a measly 1.9% of the time in 312 PAs. In the 232 PAs since then, we’ve seen Castro’s average dip to .276 but his walk rate has increased to 9.9% of the time, his swing rate on pitches out of the zone dropped by nearly 10% and Castro has seen nearly 2 more pitches per plate appearance. That’s a remarkable improvement.

Add these improvements to his 3rd straight season with improving power numbers and stolen bases, a desire to continue getting better, take into account he’s only 22 and already has 3 seasons under his belt when players his age are usually at double-A, and it’s no wonder the Cubs see Castro as a player worth the 60 million dollar risk.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Game 129: A Record is Broken

Thursday, August 30th, 2012

I debated naming this, “I’m your Daddy” due to the nature of the Cubs embarrassing 3-13 record against their closest divisional opponent, but it is more enjoyable to focus on the positive.

I’ll try and get this punched out rather quickly with the impending threat of losing power at any time down here in Mississippi. The storm has slowed down a bit since it has reached me here in Jackson, but continue to pray or think of those who again have been devastated by storm damage seven years to the day of Katrina.

The Good

Darwin Barney is now your all-time leader in the National League for consecutive games without an error at 114. Barney was erroneously charged with an error on the Segura debacle scoring-play, but it was correctly reversed an inning later by the official scorer. The throw was low by Barney but Luis Valbuena should have snagged it and tagged out Segura easily. In a season that has had a lot more doom and gloom than good, it is nice that Barney can be having a banner year. Sometimes it is the little things that makes everything better.

I thought Samardzija pitched extremely well in the losing effort. He had two mistakes where he left the fastball over the heart of the plate that almost any big league hitter will take advantage of. It’s always something with this team that flounders. Shark has pitched well enough to deserve better than the 8-12 record that he sports. At this point, our starting pitchers just need to keep the team in the game and pray that the offense will come through. Unfortunately, both them and us know better than to hope for anything more.

The Bad

N. Aoki (yes I don’t feel like looking up the spelling of his first name, remember time is of the essence) continues to be a quiet Cub killer in 2012. The Japanese import has brought a stability to the top of the Brewers lineup that they really haven’t had in recent years. Here’s hoping they don’t realize it and trade him out of the division with Marcum (who was placed on waivers this week).

The fourth through sixth inning were just disgustingly awful. Thankfully they were also quick. Shark made quick work of the Brewers lineup for three straight innings, returning ten guys in a row until the error he had in the top of the seventh. Unfortunately, the Cubs offense struggled to gain any steam against a sharp Mike Fiers (not fears, but fires). The Cubs looked clueless at the plate all night, but I suppose you all know that already.

The Ugly

Social Media sites. Twitter was unbearable tonight with the Republican Convention going on tonight.  I can’t stand talking or listening to politics. I create my own opinion based on reading a variety of different things in hopes that I don’t let myself too far one way or the other. I digress; last time I looked we lived in the United States of America. It is unfortunate that it is anything but united.

Cubbies try and avoid the sweep tomorrow with the always impressive Brooks Raley on the mound. Go get ’em big fella.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Game 128: A Stinker

Wednesday, August 29th, 2012


Brewers 4 Cubs 1

Box / Highlights


I originally intended to post this first thing but my dog was sprayed by a skunk this morning in the wee hours and the day sort of unraveled from there.  My apologies to all the faithful readers.

This game, as has been the case with many Cubs games of late, was less than entertaining.   It was the annual “Len and Bob hang out in the bleachers with the common folk”  game, and that was the extent of the entertainment.  Bob marveled at the Budweiser bottom filling beer tap contraption and Len bantered about the beauty of sitting in the bleachers.  All in all, it was the usual shtick in a slightly different setting, with the word Budweiser thrown in about 50 times per inning.  The sponsor got there moneys worth last night.  The bleachers were very empty as were the terrace seats and, well, most of the ballpark.  Here is some of the good and bad those in attendance and watching at home were able to witness….

The Good:

  • Travis Wood was okay on the mount last night.  He went seven innings and gave up five hits and three runs.  
  • Travis Wood was good at the plate last night.  He hit a homerun, his first in a Cub uniform.
  • The cameramen were especially cognizant of the attractive ladies in the stands for this game.  It seemed that every time they broke for a little tour of the ballpark or bleachers (happened a lot considering last nights broadcast from the bleachers) they managed to fill the screen with busty women.   
  • Luis Valbuena is trying his hardest to keep a job… least defensively.  He made two diving stabs down the line and threw both runners out. 

The Bad:

  • Rizzo struck out three times and looks to be struggling with the slow off speed stuff lately. 
  • The only runs Travis Wood gave up came off a three run bomb by none other than Jeff Bianchi.  Who? Oh yah him, of the baseball Bianchi’s!
  • The Cubs struck out 11 times last night.  Len rattled off a stat in the ninth regarding Cub strikeout totals against the Brewers this year.  It was something like 62 strikeouts in five games.  Somebody please tell me that is wrong.
  • The cubs have dropped 12 of 15 to the Brewers this year.  The Cubs still lead the all-time series 117-116 though, so we have that going for us. 

Watching the Cubs right now is a lot like watching spring training.  It seems like everybody is working on something.  Half the batters that stepped up to the plate last night came with the cavaet from Bob that they were working on something or making adjustments.  Such is life when you have a team full of youngsters. 

That’s about all I have for this gem.  Now, off to figure out how to get that damn skunk smell out of my nose, clothes, and house.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Minors Leaders – BB/K for Hitters

Wednesday, August 29th, 2012

The walk is still, IMO, an underrated aspect of a position players offense. It is sometimes just as good as a single, and it is always better than an out. And strikeouts, IMO, aren’t a bad thing, but it is an indication of a lack of contact.

You can still be a good offensive player if you strikeout a lot and you can still be good when you walk a little. But if you do both at the same time, you’re going to be bad. If you can manage to walk a lot and strikeout a little? You’re probably going to be good.

For reference, if we looked at BB/K ratio for major leaguers, you would have to go all the way down to #20 to get to a guy with an OBP under .337. That’s a pretty good OBP. The bottom 30 guys in BB/K ratio all have an OBP worse than .337.
10 of the worst 15 are under a .300 OBP, while 5 of the best 11 are above .400 (there are only 10 players in baseball with an OBP over .400).

So, a high BB/K ratio is a good thing. A low one is bad. What minor leaguers have the best BB to K ratio?

I limited the list to those about a .6 BB/K ratio. If you can do that in the majors, that’s the top 25%. Only 11 major leaguers have more walks than strikeouts this year. The Cubs have 4 in their minor league system doing so.

I seem to like Adrian Cardenas more than most, mainly due to this number. Ronald Torreyes is another favorite of mine. Although they are close on this list, they are complete different hitters; one with high walk totals, one with low walk totals. We’ve already seen Cardenas in the majors and I think we’ll be seeing Torreyes in another two years.

The highest ceiling players on this list would have to be either Dan Vogelbach or Matt Szczur. One thing you’ll notice on this list is a lack of power, until you get to Vogelbomb’s .648 slugging percentage. Seeing him here makes me feel better about our pre-season ranking of #4 in the system. I was done on Szczur coming into the season, but he has me intrigued now that his approach has improved so much.

I wanted to mention a few other notes. Albert Almora is near the bottom of this and has the lowest walk rate in the system (minimum 100 plate apps). He also has the 2nd lowest strikeout rate, so if his numbers are indicative of anything (they’re not), he’s going to be quite the aggressive hitter.

Joining Almora in the .20 and below range (.20 is bottom 5% of players in MLB!) is stud SS prospect, Javier Baez. These low BB/K rates don’t worry me yet, but they are something to keep an eye on.

Dave Sappelt is 23rd on the list at .51.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Turning the “Fenway Plan” into the “Wrigley Plan”

Tuesday, August 28th, 2012

by Matt Eurich

This past Saturday a dream I had had for years finally came true, I got to see a game inside Fenway Park. The sights, the sounds, and the smells all had a familiar feel to it and made me wonder, can Wrigley Field benefit from the “Fenway Plan”?

I have been lucky enough to have seen many live sporting events in my life but for as long as I can remember I have wanted to see a baseball game inside Fenway Park. This past Saturday a dream of mine finally became reality and I got to see a game inside historic Fenway Park. Although always compared to each other, Fenway proved it had a leg up on Wrigley Field and while there I was overcome by not only their similarities but the differences.

As game time approached on Saturday evening, my friends and I wandered up and down Yawkey Way alongside Fenway taking pictures, looking through Red Sox shops, purchasing surprisingly good slices of pizza and cooling ourselves off with ice cold beer. The more we wandered around the more and more it felt familiar. Sure, there wasn’t the busyness that surrounds the neighborhood of Wrigley Field, but the smell of the popcorn and the buzz in the air made me feel at home.

An hour or so before game time Yawkey Way is barricaded off and the only way to enter the area is with a valid ticket for that evening’s game. We found ourselves in a bar (Who’s On First) at that time but when we finally decided to enter the stadium there was an employee right outside the bar who would only let us enter Yawkey Way if we had our valid ticket.

The mixture of metal and concrete again conjured up memories of the friendly confines and I was just as excited to walk towards field level of Fenway as I was when I walked in to Wrigley Field for the first time when I was ten years old.

Much like Wrigley there is nostalgia and an aura to the field itself. I stood there gazing at the green monster and realized that so many greats had stepped foot on that field before; Ruth, Williams, Yastrzemski, Fisk and the list goes on and on. There I was, literally standing in a baseball museum.

After gazing around the ballpark it dawned on me, there is almost no part of the stadium that does not feature some form of advertising. There is the famous Citgo sign hovering beyond left field, Covidien plastered on the green monster (along with various others), Coca-Cola near the left foul pole and Budweiser near the right, as well as a slew of others ranging from Dunkin Donuts to New Balance. Fenway Park is a sellout in every meaning of the word. We were seated along the third base side in grandstand 30, but because of little to no renovations in that area we deemed those particular seats too uncomfortable to actually sit in.

With the opportunity to wander the park we were able to view various parts of the game from out in center field by the beautiful jumbo screen, along the first base line, and my favorite, up on the highest level just under the Coca-Cola sign that gave us an incredible view of the whole stadium.

While leaving the stadium I thought to myself, “Could the Cubs really pull this off?” Sure, throughout recent years the Cubs have become more and more willing to include advertisements throughout the park and even though they can be a bit of an eyesore the Red Sox have proven that advertisement revenue can go a long way towards increasing payroll and building a contending team.

In April, Mayor Emmanuel laid out a plan that he dubbed the “Fenway Plan”, a plan that would mimic what the Red Sox did with their historic stadium and provide a new abundance of revenue to the Cubs and the surrounding neighborhood. The proposal envisioned shutting down Waveland and Sheffield for every game just like they shut down Yawkey Way.

The shutting down of Yawkey Way works because it isn’t a normal functioning family neighborhood like Wrigley is people still need to get to and from their residence and closing down the roads will only further their frustration. The Cubs have tried a similar approach this summer hosting a “block party” but they were met with little to no fanfare.

Whenever the subject of more advertising at Wrigley Field is brought up, Cubs fans become angered. Some fans were in an uproar over the Toyota sign out in left field and the Under Armor signs on the outfield walls but to me, I see advertisements and I see more revenue that can be spent on players and the stadium in the future.

Does every corner of Wrigley need to be plastered with Nikon, Coca-Cola, or Sony? No, but in order for not only Wrigley to be improved but the team to be improved, advertisements need to happen.

Fenway Park does a great job of blending old with new. The jumbo screen next to the green monster blends in so well now you would have thought it was there when Carlton Fisk was willing his ball fair in the 1975 World Series. Fenway takes something old and iconic and does not look to degrade it but improve it. Cubs’ fans have long been against the addition of a jumbo screen fearing the demise of the iconic scoreboard. If done right a jumbo screen can be added without the degradation of the scoreboard.

Fenway Park and the “Fenway Plan” proved to me that a stadium can still have the charm of an old stadium with a touch of modernism but still bring in revenue that can benefit the team. Does the added revenue immediately improve the team? No, but that revenue could not only be spent on player development but could help improve a stadium that is in dire need of an upgrade.

People will continue to come to Wrigley Field solely because it is Wrigley Field but sooner or later improvements are going to have to be made and it is going to be tough to market both a struggling team and a struggling stadium.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us: