<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soriano is the Best Leadoff Hitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/</link>
	<description>A Chicago Cubs Blog and Fan Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9785</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9785</guid>
		<description>I think mike fontenot would be a good fit into a table seeting role for the lineup.  Alfonso soriano&#039;s leadoff homers are not valuable with no one on base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think mike fontenot would be a good fit into a table seeting role for the lineup.  Alfonso soriano&#8217;s leadoff homers are not valuable with no one on base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9784</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9784</guid>
		<description>Mike fontenot needs more playing time and would fit well into a table setter in the lineup.  What good are leadoff homers with no one on base?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike fontenot needs more playing time and would fit well into a table setter in the lineup.  What good are leadoff homers with no one on base?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boomer</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9710</link>
		<dc:creator>boomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9710</guid>
		<description>GREAT article on this at baseball prospectus...
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7184</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT article on this at baseball prospectus&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7184" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7184</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boomer</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9691</link>
		<dc:creator>boomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9691</guid>
		<description>&quot;They’re not even sample sizes, but anything more than 150 plate appearances, in my opinion, is a good enough sample size to get a good reading on what can be done by a player.&quot;

I think this 150 plate appearance number is SIGNIFICANTLY low. I&#039;d say you need more like 1000 plate appearances to get a good reading on someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They’re not even sample sizes, but anything more than 150 plate appearances, in my opinion, is a good enough sample size to get a good reading on what can be done by a player.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this 150 plate appearance number is SIGNIFICANTLY low. I&#8217;d say you need more like 1000 plate appearances to get a good reading on someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9690</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9690</guid>
		<description>^ I was going to say the same thing.  151 is not enough of a sampling.  Things can swing one way or another too much in that span of time.  He could have been in the midst of a hot streak, or cold streak.  Too skewed for me.

For me, a number two hitter that can do their job properly is more of a concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ I was going to say the same thing.  151 is not enough of a sampling.  Things can swing one way or another too much in that span of time.  He could have been in the midst of a hot streak, or cold streak.  Too skewed for me.</p>
<p>For me, a number two hitter that can do their job properly is more of a concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silkdaddy</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9689</link>
		<dc:creator>silkdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9689</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember anyone saying that it should be Theriot...

I don&#039;t think that DeRosa&#039;s 151 at-bats in the leadoff spot tell you anything.  Not enough data.  The guy has a career OBP of .341...a lot better than Sori&#039;s .328.  

Should be DeRosa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember anyone saying that it should be Theriot&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that DeRosa&#8217;s 151 at-bats in the leadoff spot tell you anything.  Not enough data.  The guy has a career OBP of .341&#8230;a lot better than Sori&#8217;s .328.  </p>
<p>Should be DeRosa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9686</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9686</guid>
		<description>As much as I think Soriano should bat lower in the order, you are right. The stats do speak for themselves. I can&#039;t help wondering though, if Lou started the season with him in the five spot and stuck with it for the season, would he would find a way to start performing there? Maybe he has just been coddled too long and not been forced to learn how to hit breaking balls. I just figure that his speed will decline soon and we will end up leading off with not only a slow but also a bad OBP hitter. Oh well, I imagine Lou doesn&#039;t want to experiment much this year and I understand why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I think Soriano should bat lower in the order, you are right. The stats do speak for themselves. I can&#8217;t help wondering though, if Lou started the season with him in the five spot and stuck with it for the season, would he would find a way to start performing there? Maybe he has just been coddled too long and not been forced to learn how to hit breaking balls. I just figure that his speed will decline soon and we will end up leading off with not only a slow but also a bad OBP hitter. Oh well, I imagine Lou doesn&#8217;t want to experiment much this year and I understand why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bleacherbummer</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9685</link>
		<dc:creator>bleacherbummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9685</guid>
		<description>I would bat D.Lee 1st, followed by Theriot, Fukodome, Ramirez, Soriano, Soto, Pie, DeRosa.  But I&#039;m guessing I&#039;ll never see that lineup to know if it works or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would bat D.Lee 1st, followed by Theriot, Fukodome, Ramirez, Soriano, Soto, Pie, DeRosa.  But I&#8217;m guessing I&#8217;ll never see that lineup to know if it works or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Aiello</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Aiello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9684</guid>
		<description>DeRosa&#039;s career as leadoff: .272 / .308 / .371</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeRosa&#8217;s career as leadoff: .272 / .308 / .371</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS</title>
		<link>http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9683</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://viewfromthebleachers.com/blog/2008/02/24/soriano-is-the-best-leadoff-hitter/#comment-9683</guid>
		<description>I never said he would. I stated that he should.

Murton or DeRosa are other in-house options who could lead off very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said he would. I stated that he should.</p>
<p>Murton or DeRosa are other in-house options who could lead off very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
