Archive for December, 2006

Cubs poised to sign Cliff Floyd

Wednesday, December 20th, 2006

Both the Chicago Tribune and Rotoworld are reporting that Jim Hendry is close to signing an agreement with former Chicagoan and New York Met Cliff Floyd. This is not surprising because Hendry and Floyd go back sixteen years, back to when Hendry recruited Floyd as baseball coach for Creighton.

This is yet another “good ol’ boy” move by Jim Hendry, the same GM who went to Dunedin High School, the same one who wasted high second round and first round picks on former Dunedin High non-prospects Brian Dopirak and Ryan Harvey. Coming off a second straight injury-plagued season, what does Hendry do? He goes out and gets a guy who has been hurt three out of the last four years.

During the past four years Floyd has averaged 117 games per season – look for Murton to platoon with Floyd in right and, given injuries I can easily see Murton getting 400 at bats. When healthy, Floyd has been an .869 OPS guy so he can sure hit, but he also strikes out a ton, averaging about a strike out every five at bats. He will take a walk however. This move effectively sounds the death knell for Jacque Jones, I seriously doubt that Jones will be manning center field in April.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

What I expect from the 2007 Chicago Cubs Starting Pitchers

Monday, December 18th, 2006

I know it’s early, but I’d like to enlighten you on my expectations for this year’s rotation as it’s constructed right now.

Say what you want about Jim Hendry and his free agent signings, but the fact is, we needed pitching and Hendry went out and got it. You may not like the fact that the Cubs spent a good chunk of change to get them. You’re entitled to that. What I ask you is, is it your money? Alright, don’t answer that. With the Cubs saying that ticket prices are not going up, I have no problem with the team opening the wallets and going out to get two starters to help this team out. Is the rotation as strong as it could have been? No, but it’s definitely a rotation that can win some games for us, especially when you factor in the amount of depth we have in the event the injury bug comes biting.

I expect more big things from Carlos Zambrano as always, especially in a contract year. This could be the year he wins the Cy Young and 20+ games. You should be able to pencil him as a given. Where a lot of people think the rotation gets hairy is in the 2-5 spots. I’m not worried. I think Rich Hill is going to turn into our version of Barry Zito, who incidentally is not all he’s cracked up to be. When you look at Zito’s numbers, he doesn’t wow you the way his contract this off-season will.

After winning 17 games in 2001 and 23 the year after, Zito has rung up totals of 14, 11, 14, and then 16 in 2006. He’s going to get paid like a # 1 starter, but he doesn’t put up ace type numbers. He’s a number two starter and will always be a number two starter. Don’t let the dollars fool you. With that in mind, we have a cheaper version in Rich Hill. He’s a little older than Zito was when he hit his stride, but when you look at the numbers Hill put up down the stretch last year, I think we’re poised to see a nice season of double digit wins from Hill. In August, he made 5 starts, posting an ERA of 3.38, an opponent average of .216 and 3 wins. In September, the numbers got better as he won another 3 games while posting an ERA of 1.93 and an opponent average of .178.

At the three spot, I expect Ted Lilly to fill in nicely. People were up in arms about the fact that the Cubs spent money on Lilly. What they seem to forget is that he won 15 games for a team that failed to make the playoffs. If you throw out 2005, where Lilly had an ERA of 5.56, you have a guy that was chugging along nicely. In 2002, his ERA of 3.69. In 2003 and 2004, he posted ERA’s of 4.34 and 4.06 respectively. Last year an ERA of 4.31. Factor in the fact that he’ll be going to a league that is much weaker in the hitting department. My one fear with Lilly is that he does throw more flyballs than groundballs and has seen his homeruns given up increase to 28 last year, which ranked him 10th in the AL (Carlos Silva from Min. had 38). If Lilly can keep guys off base, he’ll be OK. I think he makes a very serviceable number three starter.

The number four and five spots are where I start to get a little nervous. These two spots have the potential to be huge or horrible. There really isn’t much in between. If Wade Miller can find his groove and pitch the way he did in Houston when he won 45 games in a three year stretch, then we’ve got ourselves one of the best back end starters in the majors. It really will depend on his health. When he’s right, he’s an above average pitcher with the ability to keep the ball in the park and limit damage by not allowing an over amount of baserunners. Hopefully our lineup can bail him out when he’s not on.

Jason Marquis, who Cubs fans seem less than thrilled to have, should round out the rotation, assuming he doesn’t get booted by a healthy Mark Prior or a suddenly emergent farmhand like Angel Guzman, Sean Marshall, or Carlos Marmol. You can complain all you want on this one, but i’m not budging. I like this signing and I think Marquis is a lot better than the numbers he put up last season. Sometimes you have to play a hunch and that’s what Hendry’s done. When the Cardinals too a chance on Chris Carpenter, no one thought it would work out the way it has. Here are his numbers in Toronto.

2000: 10-12 with an ERA of 6.26
2001: 11-11 with an ERA of 4.09
2002: 4-5 with an ERA of 5.28

Suddenly, he goes to St. Louis and wins 15 games, posting an ERA of 3.46. The next year, he wins the Cy Young with an ERA of 2.83. Last year an ERA of 3.09 was coupled with 15 more wins. Sometimes guys just need a need start. The Cubs have given that to Marquis and I think we’ll see the benefits of it. Will we get Chris Carpenter type numbers? No, but at the number five spot, all I want is double digit wins.

Alright, now it’s your turn to let me have it. Go ahead and call me a homer and ask what I’m smoking. Remember this though. When the Cubs have five starting pitchers with double digit wins, a Cy Young winner, and a division title, i’ll be cooking up the crow for all to dine on. In the meantime, feel free to talk about your expectations for this pitching staff next year.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Getting Your Money’s Worth

Monday, December 18th, 2006

One of my favorite sites is The Hardball Times. I can lose myself in the amount of baseball information getting thrown at me on a daily basis. The guys over there have such good information that you can’t help but get smarter just by reading. Last month, I ran across a post entitled Net Win Shares Value 2006. This looked at what kind of win shares you’re getting from guys based on what type of money you’re paying them.

Bob Costas had a book that talked about competitive balance in which he said:

The fact is, the single biggest indicator of a team’s opportunity for success from one year to the next is whether the team has a payroll among the top few teams in the league. Period.

On a side note, the book really is a good read, despite the flaw in his logic on this topic. The problem with Costas’ logic, according to THB, is that “He forgot about a couple of little things called minimum salary and salary arbitration. Just remember this factoid: 37% of all 2006 Win Shares were contributed by players making the minimum last year (or close to the minimum). Ryan Howard made $355,000 last year. Joe Mauer made $400,000. Hanley Ramirez made $327,500. That’s great production from guys who weren’t paid a lot of money. If your team is able to gather a lot of these players (as were the Twins and the Marlins), then you’re going to have a great year without spending a lot of money.”

What are your thoughts on what wins championships? Is it who spends the most money? Tomorrow, we’ll look at how the players we had fared based on the money we were paying them. It should be fun. In the meantime, let’s talk about what the recipe for bringing a championship to town is.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

#31 not a useable uniform number

Sunday, December 17th, 2006

Ted Lilly was informed by the Cubs brass that uniform number 31 is not to be used; however he was informed that 21 was very useable. It makes you wonder when we will look up on a foul pole and see Jenkins and/or Maddux’ name flying above the green grass and ivy. It might be seven years or so but it’s evident what the intent is here. I would like to see both players honored…

How do you all feel about retiring #31 and should Jenkins or Maddux (or both) be on the flag? And what about #21? I personally am not in favor of seeing 21 up on a foul pole…

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Judith Regan – Fired!

Friday, December 15th, 2006

I’m not going to put myself on a pedestal and portend to be a “journalist.” I write my opinions and observations for (arguably) one of the best baseball blogs on the “internets.” That having been said, I really hate seeing poor journalism, especially when I think that somebody is attempting to manipulate the public readership for personal gain. Therefore it gives me great pleasure to announce that Judith Reagan has been fired by Harper Collins which, along with FOX Network, is a property of international financier Rupert Murdock.

Recently Regan stooped so low as to pilot a book and FOX miniseries about the OJ Simpson murders entitled “If I Did It.” I had no interest in seeing this chicanery since I feel *I know* how OJ did it. Granted he’s an innocent man in the eyes of the law, but he sure ain’t innocent in my eyes. The LA District Attorney’s office and a couple of LA policemen totally botched this case and consequentially Simpson deserved his judgment. Which doesn’t exactly make him “innocent” in the eyes of his Maker. But that’s to be decided later, isn’t it.

What really sealed the casket of this journalistic impostor was the recent allegations thrown at deceased Yankees player Mickey Mantle. Now the Mick was no poster boy for sobriety – I remember seeing him drunker than a fiddler’s bitch at a church next to Hinsdale Junior High School in the early 70s. But nobody who knew the Mick will corroborate these allegations. And these insinuations also cuckold a dead man – one of the greatest ballplayers of all time, Joltin’ Joe DiMaggio, a quiet man who seemed almost embarrassed by all the attention that was paid to him, a guy who only wanted to go out and play his position to the very best of his abilities.

So Judith Regan is fired. Good riddance to bad rubbish, she’s scum just like the former footballer she wrote about. And congratulations to Rupert Murdock, who occasionally makes the right decision.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Cubs might use Pie in centerfield

Thursday, December 14th, 2006

Jim Hendry had an interview on 670 The Score today, he suggested that using Felix Pie in center is a strong possibility. Last year for Iowa, Pie hit .282 with an OBP of .341 and an slugging percentage of .451. He stole 17 bases but he gets caught a lot. He’s also a free swinger and needs to cut down on his strikeouts.

I am not adverse to this idea for several reasons. First of all, you can’t spend $8-15 million at every position and eventually we need to give our center field prospects (Pie, Walker, Fuld and Colvin) a chance. Or we need to trade them. Secondly, we need a strong defensive center if we are going to have Soriano in left and Jones/Murton in right.

Hendry also defended his signing of Jason Marquis, stating that Marquis’ numbers were comparable to Zito and Schmidt’s wins and innings pitched for the past three years. I thought this comparison was absurd, since the Cards had a far stronger rotation surrounding Jason and his purpose was arguably to *eat innings.* While Marquis averaged near fifteen wins a year, so did his losses and he played for a team that has made the playoffs three years in a row. So Hendry’s argument in this respect was at best specious.

Ultimately The Cubs GM’s job will hinge on the signings of Liily and Marquis – if they are busts he’ll either be fired after 2007 or spend 2008 grooming his replacement. For what it’s worth, he also said that he’s still in the market for a left handed bat. Were I to guess it would be to replace Jones’.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Marcus Giles non-tendered by Atlanta

Tuesday, December 12th, 2006

I’m really surprised that Schuerholz made this move, supposedly it was budget-related. By Giles standards, a .341 OBP and .387 SLG in 2006 was indeed disappointing! But when you look at the guy’s previous levels it’s surprising that they would give up on him so early.

Perhaps the Cubs should consider pouncing on this guy and using DeRosa in a corner, perhaps taking Jacque Jones’ job. I smell opportunity!

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

Elijah Dukes in Cubbie Blue?

Monday, December 11th, 2006

There has been a lot of controversy around what to do with Elijah Dukes. One of my favorite sites, The Hardball Times, ran a piece called A Closer Look at Elijah Dukes. Personally, i’d love to see the Rays make a decision about this guy right away. Either trade him now, before he has a chance to let the anger ruin his career, or trade Baldelli and give Dukes a shot in the big leagues. To put him a first would be a waste of his athletic ability completely. The Rays have too many outfielders on their team. It’s time to start swapping them for some pitching to compete in that AL East.

Here are the highlights:

The career trajectories of similar players at age 22 suggest Dukes has a 46% chance to be among the top third of all major league corner outfielders by age 25. That’s one of the highest values generated among current minor leaguers, but it also implies a 54% chance that he’s not a star in his prime. And that’s where the problems begin.

When Dukes is on the field, he plays with exceptional hustle and intensity. He regularly barrels into second basemen trying to turn a double play. In a game at Durham six months ago, Dukes managed to knock down a catcher and an umpire with a slide into home plate. He says he would like to become “like a big Pete Rose” and aptly models Rose’s aggressive style of play.

Here is the link to the rest of the article. It’s a good read. What are your thoughts on what the Rays should do with Dukes? Should he be an option the Cubs look at pursuing? The Rays need pitching, so we could possibly offer a package of maybe Marshall and Marmol and get Dukes. Maybe it would take more. I’m not sure. What are your thoughts?

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us:

A terrible decision!

Saturday, December 9th, 2006

Many years ago I was a buyer/inventory control manager for a big Chicago-based printing company. Once I placed an order and made a typographical error on the paperwork, it was an innocent mistake. Consequently I ordered about ten thousand dollars worth of wrong materials. A few days later a bindery operator came to me about the error and I instantly recognized the impact of my mistake; after that I went home for lunch, drank two stiff drinks and wrote my letter of resignation. I knew I was done.

As a last gambit I called the president of the company that I screwed up the order with and confessed – he had a truck at our back door two hours later and within two days he replaced the wrong product with what we needed.

I was lucky, I made a $10 thousand error and survived.

Jim Hendry just made a $20 million mistake and you don’t recover from those; those are what are called ‘career-ending capers.’ Last year Jason Marquis had a 6.06 ERA – in 194 1/3 innings he gave up 221 hits and 75 walks. Get used to some baserunners Cubs fans, this guy gets rocked. He’s been clueless for two years; who here thinks that Larry Rothschild can reform a guy that Dave Duncan couldn’t? I’m not even sure why Rothschild is still our pitching coach, he sure hasn’t earned the position.

Everybody knew the Cubs needed starting pitching going into 2006 – Jim Hendry failed to come through. Everybody knew after 2006 that the Cubs needed starting pitching and Hendry failed again. How many years does this guy get? He can sure spend money but can he deliver? Methinks not, he’s way out of his league. The signing of Jason Marquis for twenty million dollars proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that Jim Hendry has more dollars than he has sense.

Like what you see here? Never miss new content. Follow Us: